Policyholder Triumphs in Machinery Damage Dispute

0

The incident occurred in June 2017 when the glass handling machine tipped over while reversing. A representative from the involved business suggested that the machine's anti-crush functionality might have inadvertently been activated, causing it to lurch and topple under the load of a substantial glass sheet that measured 9.5 metres in height. Speed was also cited as a potential factor.

QBE, the insurer, initially rejected the claim based on assessments from the machine supplier's managing director and their own loss adjuster. These experts contended that the mishap was likely due to the glass panel being lifted off-centre and the boom being set too high during operation.

In contrast, the business's own glass specialist attributed the incident to operator error. Their argument highlighted the challenges in precisely aligning the lifting point with the panel's centre of gravity, particularly as it shifts when the machine rotates.

AFCA's ruling pointed out that, while the glass should normally be lifted at its centre of gravity, as per the machine's manual, the actual situation involved more complex dynamics. The authority found no definitive evidence that not adhering fully to these instructions directly led to the incident, and thus deemed the insurer's exclusion inapplicable. Furthermore, AFCA cast doubt on the supplier's MD's technical conclusions and his potential conflict of interest.

Ultimately, the decision underscores the importance of nuanced technical assessments in insurance disputes and calls for insurers to thoroughly investigate all claims aspects.

Looking forward, this ruling could influence future disputes where operational mishaps intersect with technical manual prescriptions, potentially prompting insurers to revisit their evaluation protocols and company guidance concerning machinery operation claims.

Published:Wednesday, 6th Aug 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

ASIC Calls for Revamp in Life Insurance Sales and Service 21 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has issued a call to action for life insurance companies, urging them to enhance their product offerings and sales processes. While acknowledging some progress since the Hayne Royal Commission, ASIC highlights ongoing issues within the industry. The regulator emphasized the importance of centering strategies around customer needs, particularly as companies aim to expand direct-to-consumer sales. - read more

Regulatory Scrutiny Reveals Ongoing Failures in Direct Life Insurance Sales 20 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has released findings from a recent review, revealing persistent deficiencies in the direct sales practices of the life insurance industry. Despite heightened scrutiny following the Hayne Royal Commission, challenges remain in several key areas, including product design, sales strategies, remuneration, and customer complaint handling. - read more

Life Insurers Urge Government Action on Mental Health Funding 19 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori Life insurers in Australia have joined forces with mental health advocates to press the federal government to honour its $1 billion pledge for mental health initiatives. The Council of Australian Life Insurers (CALI) is among the key signatories of an open letter organized by Australians for Mental Health, urging swift action on funding allocation. - read more

Victorian Resilient Homes Initiative Supported by Insurance Council 18 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori The Insurance Council of Australia (ICA) has expressed strong support for a Victorian initiative proposing a resilient homes scheme, akin to those currently operating in New South Wales and Queensland. This recommendation emerged from a comprehensive inquiry into climate resilience conducted by Victoria's Legislative Council Environment and Planning Committee, which presented 93 findings alongside 82 recommendations this week. - read more

Broker Ordered to Compensate Client for Uninsured Fire Losses 15 Aug 2025: Paige Estritori A recent ruling mandates an insurance broker to pay nearly $300,000 in compensation to a client after an insurer, QBE, declined a fire claim and cancelled the policy due to nondisclosures. The fire, which occurred in October 2022, severely damaged the commercial premises. QBE asserted that they would have denied coverage had they known about asbestos on the property, among other unreported issues. - read more